Frerik van Beijnum
26 July 2012
Tags: conference, Presentations, Scientific community
Posted in Conferences, Speaking in public
Last May I visited the first large scale international conference (CLEO) during my PhD. I was shocked about the enormous contrast with smaller scale (more specialized) conferences. In this post, I will discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages that struck me during this conference.
Read more... (384 words, estimated 1:32 minutes reading time)
Ad Lagendijk
12 April 2012
Tags: authorSTREAM, example presentation, Facebook, Google Docs, Presentations, slide sharing, SlideBoom, SlideShare
Posted in useful software, Web 2.0
In my previous post I discussed a feature I would like to be implemented by slide-sharing services. I am not going to repeat here all the arguments why slide sharing is useful for scientists. I just want to discuss the present quality of the engines used by these services. I consider here SlideShare, authorSTREAM, SlideBoom and Google Docs from the point of view of scientists. Two years ago I pointed out to you that SlideBoom was by far the best. After two years much could have been changed in a world where nowadays everything on the Internet is about sharing.
Read more... (652 words, 1 image, estimated 2:36 minutes reading time)
Ad Lagendijk
11 April 2012
Tags: authorSTREAM, example presentation, Facebook, Google Docs, Presentations, slide sharing, SlideBoom, SlideShare
Posted in Presentations quality, Speaking in public, useful software, Web 2.0

Ten years years ago the major computer company Sun Microsystems advertised in all media with the slogan: “The network is the computer”. And I must admit they knew where they were talking about. They saw the clouds coming. Sun has been taken over by Oracle in 2009.
Read more... (1062 words, 1 image, estimated 4:15 minutes reading time)
Ad Lagendijk
26 November 2010
Tags: Maple, MathCad, Mathematica, Origin, Presentations
Posted in Presentations quality, useful software
When you look at modern scientific journals you will find that in the majority of papers (some of) the results are presented in graphical form, from a simple black-and-white X-Y plot to sophisticated multicolor 3D-plots.
The data that are graphed come from various origins, like filled-out surveys, output of detectors, or mathematical programs. If the data are gathererd or produced by a commercial computer program, the developers of that program will try to supply graphing capabilities within the program.
Keeping users tied to a program is of high commercial value. So Microsoft’s programs Word and Excel supply plotting facilities, although the capability is so rudimentary that it does not deserve the name.
Read more... (1154 words, 10 images, estimated 4:37 minutes reading time)
Readers' comments
This post is extremely useful! If you follow the guidelines your ...
9 May 2013 19:13, B.Gjonaj
It's true that WYSIWYG are definitively annoying for experienced users. On the ...
7 May 2013 15:09, Daniel
I beg to differ with you Ad Lagendijk. I really love these ...
5 May 2013 17:18, Bingo Crepuscule
Thanks for the advice. Google Scholar appears indeed quite powerful in finding ...
30 Apr 2013 10:41, Bingo Crepiscule
Thanks for pointing out. Diederik Stapel does not seem to have the slightest ...
30 Apr 2013 10:18, Bingo Crepiscule