<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Survival Blog for Scientists &#187; open standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencesurvivalblog.com/tag/open-standard/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencesurvivalblog.com</link>
	<description>How to become a leading scientist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:30:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Elsevier is going the wrong way</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencesurvivalblog.com/getting-published/elsevier-is-going-the-wrong-way_1003</link>
		<comments>http://www.sciencesurvivalblog.com/getting-published/elsevier-is-going-the-wrong-way_1003#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ad Lagendijk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Getting published]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open standard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencesurvivalblog.com/?p=1003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Summary
Reed-Elsevier’s daughter Elsevier has introduced as an experiment a new way of publishing science. The &#8220;paper&#8221; is now basically a website, in which the idea of a linear text is abandoned. The web interface implements access to text fragments, graphs, supplementary material, interview with an author, through hyperlinked tabs and mundane hyperlinks. In my opinion [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sciencesurvivalblog.com/getting-published/elsevier-is-going-the-wrong-way_1003/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
