9 February 2013
Tags: career, h-index, Impact factor, publications
Posted in High-impact journals, politics, Tips
The scientific community keeps on finding new ways to facilitate to judge scientists. The old-fashioned way of reading her papers, listening to her talks, interviewing her for more than an hour, reading recommendation letters, and consulting colleagues personally takes way too much time.
Read more... (561 words, 2 images, estimated 2:15 minutes reading time)
Frerik van Beijnum
7 October 2012
Tags: career, co-authors, collaboration, h-index, Impact factor, papers
Posted in Ethics, Getting published, PhD life
A problem I often encounter is deciding who to invite as co-authors. On one hand, you want to show appreciation to the people that helped you in the process of obtaining your results. On the other hand, generously adding authors will dilute the contribution of the people that made the largest contribution. In this post I would like to sketch a few hypothetical situations in which someone could be a co-author. The main goal here is to provoke some discussion on this subject, and learn about some good practices.
Read more... (674 words, 1 image, estimated 2:42 minutes reading time)
30 March 2012
Tags: high impact, Impact factor, Nature, Science Magazine, social networking
Posted in Conferences, Ethics, Getting published, politics
In this post the ever increasing socializing with journal editors at conferences is critically discussed. Suggestions are put forward to make the social role of junior scientists more prominent at conferences and preventing the successful scientists from taking it all.
Table of content
My relatives think that scientists work in a lab, discover something, write a paper about it and get famous.
Read more... (1167 words, 3 images, estimated 4:40 minutes reading time)