Posted in Getting published, Technical (ms word, tex), useful software, Web 2.0
In a post two years ago I discussed how difficult it was to find good tools for editing scientific texts by multiple authors simultaneously. As there is a great demand for this functionality it does not come to a surprise that the situation has improved considerably. I will describe two solutions here that in our group we now use on a daily base.
Scientists regularly write text with other authors. In the old days authors kept on sending emails to each other with as attachments the latest version of the manuscript. This is a sure recipe for chaos including as disasters where authors were editing an old version or where new versions got lost.
With cloud servers like Dropbox there is no need any more to send each other new versions. They can all be downloaded from cloud server. This improvement however does not exclude authors working on different versions. On average scientists are not very good in understanding new digital products and with this cloud solution they regularly forget to synchronize their local copy with the cloud server. In addition cloud servers as Dropbox take up so much bandwidth of a desktop computer that it becomes problematic to have a live connection all of the time.
So we need an on-line service where the source files are located at just one location and where live editing is possible and not to slow. Google Drive seems to be a solution but their file format is a disaster. Under the interface it is all dirty and poor html unsuitable for scientists who share sheets, documents and presentation.
Acceptable solution 1: overleaf
Physicists and mathematicians need many formula’s in their papers. In such a case there is no alternative to Latex and its sisters Tex, AmsTex, etc. If you think that equations formatted with Equation Editor or MathType look great you are an amateur and you should go for Acceptable solution 2.
The site overleaf.com has a great Latex interface, where people can edit simultaneously the same file (left panel) and see the result as a pdf file (right panel). It works great and we are moving more and more all our papers in on that site.
Acceptable solution 2: onedrive
Many scientific journals allow manuscripts that are formatted as MS Word files. Microsoft has now created a cloud-based solution that is quite acceptable. On the Microsoft site onedrive.com files can be shared with and edited simultaneously by multiple authors with a MS Word browser interface. Users can also install a local program (client) that allows to edit a local copy of the file with an Office desktop application. In the latter case users should check whether their local copies of the files are synchronized.
Advice: use your onedrive file collection only for a limited number of files. In such a situation all the files are quickly synchronized and your computer does not suffer from a performance penalty with the onedrive client installed.