About: Ad Lagendijk
- Website
- http://www.adlagendijk.com
- Profile
- Ad Lagendijk is group leader at the FOM institute Amolf. In addition he is distinguished University Professor at the University of Amsterdam and professor of physics at the University of Twente.
Posts by Ad Lagendijk:
-
03 May 2010 Our readers want to know everything about impact factors -
23 Mar 2010 Should scientists make their own drawings and illustrations? -
19 Mar 2010 How to publicize your paper? -
16 Mar 2010 Our blog rated to belong to Top 50 Blogs by graduate students -
16 Mar 2010 In web 2.0 learned societies could rule the Internet -
14 Mar 2010 Upgraded to WordPress 2.9 -
09 Mar 2010 Do we need a WYSIWYG editor for Tex, LaTex, and AmsTex? -
08 Mar 2010 I could give a much longer talk -
07 Mar 2010 Making good pdf files with MS Word -
21 Jan 2010 Mouse on glass surface does not work -
16 Dec 2009 Five-million dollar question -
06 Dec 2009 How to justify text with MS Word -
03 Dec 2009 Critical article on the H-Index -
28 Nov 2009 Stop color #666 -
08 Nov 2009 Where are your error bars? -
08 Sep 2009 Can we refer to Wikipedia articles in a scientific paper? -
01 Sep 2009 Publishing a comment on a paper -
12 Aug 2009 Elsevier is going the wrong way -
19 Jul 2009 Sharing my slides -
24 Jun 2009 Last-minute preparations for a presentation -
26 May 2009 Who is the owner of scientific equipment? -
04 May 2009 Example presentation: Surviving science -
22 Apr 2009 Which research group should a student join for his PhD? -
10 Apr 2009 Will the reviewer of my grant proposal steal my ideas? -
08 Feb 2009 Example of excellent presentation: Femius Koenderink -
04 Feb 2009 Software, like EndNote, for managing references is basically trash -
17 Jan 2009 Add-ons to the Science Survival Guide -
15 Jan 2009 Territorial disputes -
03 Nov 2008 Types of presentations -
17 Oct 2008 What is wrong with Google’s superior software for scientists? -
18 Sep 2008 Working on the same manuscript with several authors -
31 Aug 2008 Blowing up your publication list and CV with trash -
28 Aug 2008 Why don’t you have more scientific collaborations? -
27 Aug 2008 Why don’t *You* organize a conference? -
15 Aug 2008 Giving your new results away too soon -
24 Jul 2008 Immoral funding rates -
17 Jul 2008 Survival Guide gets already second edition -
23 Jun 2008 Are you also a speaker who loves to drown his audience? -
05 Jun 2008 Feedback when speaker is big shot -
03 Jun 2008 There is no science to Web 2.0 yet -
27 May 2008 Scientists publicly complaining about lack of recognition -
24 May 2008 Help young researchers with easy grants -
24 May 2008 Dealing with companies -
22 May 2008 Finding information on (web) pages and slides. Top left please. -
20 May 2008 Should we pay referees? -
07 May 2008 Jam-packed slides, with some bad examples -
05 May 2008 Who needs coauthors? -
22 Apr 2008 Selling science with candy sticks and flying carpets -
19 Apr 2008 Unwanted hard returns frustrate me -
12 Apr 2008 Do scientists have great jobs? -
04 Apr 2008 Abolish relative arbitrary units







Readers' comments
Thanks for the advice. It sounds almost too simple and like something people should come up by themselves. Unfortunately, most ...
19 Jul 2010 8:46, Julio E. Peironcely
Getting grants funded is a much less platonic enterprise than the science itself. I recently ran into a science professor ...
20 Jun 2010 19:32, Gijs
Hi, One question - where would you include correspondence? Some journals e.g. Nature publish "Letters" as full articles, whereas, correspondence elsewhere ...
11 Jun 2010 23:09, MH
I agree with what have been said above. Should the normalization be done against the total number of publications he/she authored/co-authored ...
8 Jun 2010 23:08, labuddy
I spent the spare time on the unfinished ideas,because the working time is controlled strictly by the boss and ...
7 Jun 2010 14:26, danxian